Question

Science talent redirected
“Is science talent squandered?” (SN: 5/31/97, p.338) sent me into a reverie of my precollege days. Having achieved, at 10 years of age, minor celebrity status in Nation’s Business by inventing a “new” cotton picker, having burned holes in my parents’ basement ceiling with my huge Gilbert chemistry set, and having been given a key to the high school lab to conduct my own experiments on weekends, I knew I would be a scientist.


Then came college and the public denigration( in an introductory chemistry class) of my poetic expression of the practical application of combustion. Literary and artistic teachers and friends enjoyed “weird” presentation, so I joined their ranks instead, achieving modest adult recognition as a writer but still finding my real Reading interest in Science. If I had found a Carl Sagan some 40 years ago, I might be in a different college in my university today, but perhaps with different regrets.

F. Richard Thomas, Professor of American Thought and Language, Michigan State , University, East Lansing, Mich.


1.(Fuvest – SP) o artigo intitulado “Is Science talent squandered?”:

a) narra a evolução acadêmica de F.R. Thomas.

b) tornou F.R. Thomas uma pequena celebridade.

c) fez F.R. Thomas lembrar-se de tempos passados.

d) foi escrito para Carl Sagan.


2.(Fuvest – SP) De acordo com o texto, F.R. Thomas:

a) é discípulo e admirador de Sagan, apesar de lamentar tê-lo conhecido há apenas 40

anos.

b) gostaria de ter conhecido Sagan há 40 anos, para se arrepender menos das

realizações de sua vida.

c) encontrou Sagan na universidade em que leciona, embora numa faculdade diferente

da sua.

d) acredita que poderia ter seguido um rumo diferente na vida, se tivesse lido Sagan há

40 anos.

Answer 1

Resposta:

1) C

2) D

Explicação: